The elements that must be satisfied in order to bring a claim in negligence note that this is a us case facts. At this time, another train bound for a different location stopped at the platform and two men raced to board it. While the train was departing a man tried to catch it. Palsgraf was injured by falling machinery at the long island terminal, the high court of new york held that. Long island railroad co, the case was considered in 1928. Palsgraf, waiting by a train, is bonked by some scales which fell as a result of the shock. Plaintiff will not be held to be negligent in rescuing a child. It is a classic example of an american offense on the issue of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff and is being studied by students to this day. This is a lego recreation of the famous tort case, palsgraf v. Palsgraf v long island railroad co 1928, america facts 2 guards helped a passenger carrying a package get onto a train, resulting in the passenger dropping the package.
The explosion knocked a scale on the other end of the platform which landed on palsgraf. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Clearly we must so consider, for the greater the distance either in time or space, the. This article appeared on wikipedia s main page as todays featured article on august 24, 2017. One of the men reached the platform of the car without mishap. Jul 07, 2015 the scene is a loud and bustling railroad station on east long island almost one hundred years ago.
The explosion was an unforeseen isolated incident involving long island employees, and the scale falling was another isolated incident not involving long island employees. Negligence implies some act of commission or omission wrongful in itself. The plaintiff helen palsgraf was standing at the platform station of long island railroad company after buying her. Two men ran to catch the train as it was moving away from the station. The package, which gave no indication of its contents, contained fireworks which exploded. The package contained fireworks, fell onto the track and exploded. Example irac palsgraf v long island railroad co 248 ny 339. Court of appeals of new york argued february 24, 1928 decided may 29, 1928 248 ny 339 cite title as.
Helen palsgraf, respondent, v the long island railroad company, appellant. The train began to slow down and the first man jumped onto the train successfully, while. There was no way for the guards to know the contents of the package. Whilst the defendants employees were helping a passenger aboard a train, the package he was carrying was dislodged and fell on the track.
Jun 03, 20 group 3 from primianis political science 200 class reenacts the facts from the. Andrews died in 1928, only months after writing his dissent, and he is now chiefly remembered for a minority opinion in a state court case, although he will be remembered by many american law students for many years to come. The case was heard by the new york court of the highest state court in new york. The case was heard by the new york court of appeals, the highest state court in new york. In july 1924 fifty more were injured, and one woman killed, when a worker prematurely threw a crossover switch and derailed a commuter train. The video was mentioned in the following new york times article. Long island railroad, which suffered from poor pr and an even poorer accident record during the 1920s. Palsgraf v long island railroad co 1928, america case. A man was running to catch a train, and a guard standing on the platform pushed him from behind to assist him. Nyls alumni were involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness. Plaintiff was standing on a platform of defendants railroad when a train stopped which was headed in a different direction than the train plaintiff was boarding. Jan 23, 2005 andrews died in 1928, only months after writing his dissent, and he is now chiefly remembered for a minority opinion in a state court case, although he will be remembered by many american law students for many years to come.
The court that decided the case was the court of appeals of new york. Clearly we must so consider, for the greater the distance either in time or space, the more surely do other causes intervene to affect the result. It was a package of small size, about fifteen inches long, and was covered by a newspaper. Life will have to be made over, and human nature transformed, before prevision so extravagant can be accepted as the norm of conduct, the customary standard to which behavior must conform. A man had been running to catch a departing train at the station and was helped onto it by two l.
Plaintiff was standing on a platform of defendants railroad after buying a ticket to go to rockaway beach. It is a classic example of an american offense on the issue of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff and is. The package was full of fireworks and exploded, causing a scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff. One of the railroads employees gave him a shove, and he dropped a nondescript package which. The claimant was standing on a station platform purchasing a ticket. Whilst she was doing so a train stopped in the station and two men ran to catch it. Whether the action of ds guard was a negligent act such as would make ps injury reasonably foreseeable as a risk or damage.
A great judge, benjamin cardozo, penned the majority opinion. In every instance, before negligence can be predicated of a given act, back of the act must be sought and found a duty to the individual complaining, the observance of which would have averted or avoided the injury mcsherry, c. Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a man get on a moving train. In this act, the package was dislodged, and fell upon the rails. The case was argued in february 24, 1928 and was decided in may 29, 1928. Defendant was responsible for injuries to plaintiff resulting from an explosion. Zone of danger issues issues terms videos rules ruling discussion. To recover for negligence, the plaintiff must establish each of the following elements. A train stopped at the station, bound for another place. The scene is a loud and bustling railroad station on east long island almost one hundred years ago. The appellate division of the supreme court in the second judicial department new york affirmed the trial courts holding that the long island r.
Palsgraf was entering the train after purchasing a ticket. Palsgraf, plaintiff, was standing on a platform owned by the long island railroad company, defendant, waiting for the train to rockaway beach. The man nearly fell over and the railroad employees tried to help him out, while they were trying to help him he dropped his package that was. A motorman ran a red signal in 1921, crashing into another lirr train and injuring fifty.
A whistle blows, an engine begins to gather steam, and the nearest train starts to crawl down the tracks away from the station. The facts of palsgraf stick in our minds because judge cardozo helpfully outlined them in his very first paragraph. Under foreseeability concepts is there a connection between an act and an injury strong enough to impose liability when the conduct of a railroad guard causes a wrapped package to explode and a scale at the other end of the platform falls on top of another passenger because of the explosion. One of the railroads employees gave him a shove, and he dropped a nondescript package which turned out to be filled with fireworks. The plaintiff claimed the long island railroad companys negligence resulted in injury to her. Group 3 from primianis political science 200 class reenacts the facts from the.
Oct 17, 2017 the explosion was an unforeseen isolated incident involving long island employees, and the scale falling was another isolated incident not involving long island employees. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. A guard on the car, who had held the door open, reached forward to help him in, and another guard on the platform pushed him from behind. Plaintiff was standing on a train platform owned by defendant. Dozens of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places. While she was waiting to catch a train, a different train bound for another destination stopped at the station.
1121 558 945 471 144 554 326 487 1612 1396 1076 1604 1544 214 53 1477 333 1372 826 393 1638 1401 1528 1537 1201 422 1229 27 587 111 314 76 1196 771